home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- <text id=89TT1031>
- <title>
- Apr. 17, 1989: A Case Of Wright And Wrong
- </title>
- <history>
- TIME--The Weekly Newsmagazine--1989
- Apr. 17, 1989 Alaska
- </history>
- <article>
- <source>Time Magazine</source>
- <hdr>
- NATION, Page 25
- A Case of Wright and Wrong
- </hdr><body>
- <p>Despite alleged wrongdoing, the Speaker is likely to survive
- </p>
- <p> Ethics is all the rage in Washington these days, as Speaker
- of the House Jim Wright can testify. This week the House Ethics
- Committee will release a 450-page report summing up a ten-month
- investigation of Wright's alleged wrongdoing. A vocal minority
- of Republicans, led by G.O.P. whip Newt Gingrich, predict that
- the inquiry will result in Wright's censure, removal as Speaker
- or maybe even expulsion. But in the end he is likely to hang on
- to his job because this is an argument not about right and
- wrong but about the peculiar ethics rules of the House.
- </p>
- <p> Those rules tolerate large swaths of gray and encourage
- euphemism. Bribes, graft and expenses-paid vacations are never
- talked about on Capitol Hill. Honorariums, campaign
- contributions and per diem travel reimbursements are. Cash
- gifts, even of $100,000, are not automatically illegal, as long
- as they are disclosed and the giver has no direct interest in
- legislation. Neither is free use of posh apartments and
- expensive cars.
- </p>
- <p> The Wright investigation began last June when Republicans,
- stung by the improprieties of Mike Deaver and Ed Meese, set out
- to make sleaze a bipartisan issue. As the highest-ranking
- Democrat, Wright, whose slicked-back hair, caterpillar eyebrows
- and leering grin give him the look of a wheeler-dealer, was a
- good target. After revelations of an unusual deal in which a
- Texas publisher paid Wright 55% royalties -- three or four
- times the usual rate -- for a collection of the Speaker's
- speeches and anecdotes, Common Cause and 72 Republicans asked
- the House Ethics Committee to investigate.
- </p>
- <p> The $1.5 million probe unearthed numerous allegations, many
- of which have been discarded. The committee found that Wright's
- heavy-handed intervention with federal officials on behalf of
- failing Texas savings and loan associations was no more than
- what other Texas Congressmen were doing. His intercession with
- Government officials and Egypt's Anwar Sadat to help a Texas
- oil-and-gas company was also found to be all in a day's work for
- the average member.
- </p>
- <p> That leaves the committee to decide on two questions that
- are, at the least, embarrassing to the Speaker. One is whether
- Wright's financial dealings with Fort Worth developer George
- Mallick violated House rules. The other is whether Wright's
- sweetheart royalty deal was designed to get around
- congressional limits on outside income.
- </p>
- <p> Mallick, who has known the Speaker for some 30 years, hired
- Wright's wife Betty in 1979 as an adviser. The job description
- was hazy, but the salary was $18,000 a year. Perks included a
- rent-free apartment and a Cadillac. In 1981, for the same
- salary and benefits, Betty Wright went to work for Mallightco,
- an investment company that the Wrights had formed with Mallick
- and his wife. Betty Wright also borrowed $75,000 from
- Mallightco. After she stopped working for the company in 1984,
- the Wrights paid $21.67 per diem for the apartment when they
- used it and then purchased it in 1988 for $58,500. Eventually
- they bought the Cadillac.
- </p>
- <p> In 1985 Mallick co-signed $2.2 million loan for a real
- estate project developed by his two sons. In 1986, when Mallick
- feared the loan might be foreclosed, he organized a meeting in
- Fort Worth at which struggling thrift officials complained to
- Wright about overzealous federal regulation; he later gave the
- Speaker a report on their complaints. During this period Wright
- was deeply involved in efforts to draft legislation that would
- help ailing S & Ls and grant them more leniency from federal
- regulators.
- </p>
- <p> Then there is Reflections of a Public Man, the most
- notorious non-best seller of 1984. Critics charge that the
- unusually high 55% royalty payments could have been used to
- thwart rules that would keep the Speaker from accepting more
- than $34,500 in speaking fees annually. At least three times,
- staff members -- once with the Speaker's knowledge -- asked the
- sponsors of Wright speeches not to pay an honorarium but buy an
- equivalent number of books instead. By so doing, the speaker
- could pocket the proceeds without breaching the limit.
- </p>
- <p> Although Republicans once smelled blood, it now looks as if
- Wright will survive. Wright's financial ties to Mallick seem to
- have ended before he began his campaign on behalf of Texas
- thrifts. Wright has no investments in S & Ls. Besides, the
- highly partisan attacks by Wright's archenemy Newt Gingrich
- have aroused the Democrats' protective instincts. Democrats
- with ambition to succeed Wright, like Dan Rostenkowski and John
- Dingell, have not deserted him, nor has Majority Leader Tom
- Foley, probably the only Democrat popular enough to win his
- spot. No matter how unseemly Wright's dealings may appear to
- ordinary citizens, they are probably not unseemly enough to
- violate the shabby standards that apply on Capitol Hill.
- </p>
-
- </body></article>
- </text>
-
-